How To Quit Your Israeli Job and Still Receive Severance Pay

This article was published exclusively at JobMob

Scared about your severance rights?

The employed-job sector has gone through many revolutionary changes in recent years that are characterized mainly by a huge turnover of positions. The days when an employee was secure and stable in his position for life – that were a major factor in accepting a position – are no longer. Employees aren’t afraid anymore to change jobs and if someone stays at a position for 3-4 years it is considered a long-term position. Due to high employee mobilization, many employees would like to resign in order to pursue other job opportunities but refrain from doing so because they know they will only get severance pay if they are terminated by their employer.

A new law may help…

There is a pending law that is waiting for Knesset verification, which if passed will enable employees to resign after completing one year of tenure with an employer and still receive severance pay. Many are skeptical about this law’s chances, especially since it was already voted upon in the 16th Knesset and defeated.

Update 18/11/10: the law still hasn’t passed yet.

What is “a tangible worsening”?

The most common case of resignation that is recognized by law as a “forced situation” on the employee – thereby granting him severance pay rights as if he was terminated – is called a tangible worsening of his employment conditions or reasons that as a result one would not be expected to continue in his position. The wording “a tangible worsening” includes a very wide range of situations which aren’t clearly explicit in the wording of the law. So what is “a tangible worsening” ? The rulings of Israel’s National Labor Court have defined this as a situation in which the employer has narrowed an employee’s steps or worsened his working conditions to a point where he has no alternative but to resign.

Typical examples

The classic case is regarding an employee’s wages, which are a basic and integral part of any employee’s terms and conditions of employment in a contract between the employee and the employer and cannot be disregarded unilaterally by the employer. Valid instances that are determined to be “a tangible worsening” of terms of employment are:

  • frequently recurring failure to pay salaries for an extended period of time
  • failure to pay minimum wages
  • reducing wages (salary cut)

There are, of course, other reasons that fit well into this category. For example, failure to transfer social benefits that have been deducted from employee’s payslips to their destination, or employing an employee at less than minimum conditions as specified by the law. One example of the latter is requiring an employee to work on Shabbat or a holiday without ample compensation as required by law. Another would be an employer ignoring significant breaches in safety, health issues. Unfortunately, a one-time case isn’t usually regarded as “a tangible worsening”.

15 cases according to the Severance Pay Law

Here is a list of 15 cases where an employee can resign and claim severance pay according to the Israeli severance pay law (Hebrew):

  1. wage cut
  2. wages at below the required minimum
  3. repeated tardy payments of salaries
  4. non-transfer of social benefits
  5. employment on Shabbat or holiday w/o required upgraded compensation
  6. employer ignoring safety or health issues
  7. infringement on employee’s status, authorization or responsibilities
  8. change of employers
  9. transfer of employee to another site with same employer
  10. employee’s change of residential address (to over 40 km distance)
  11. deterioration of health of employee or member of immediate family
  12. an employee who was sexually harassed
  13. a female employee who stayed at a shelter for abused women for over 60 days
  14. an employee who after giving birth and completing maternity leave, wants to resign in order to stay home and take care of her baby
  15. an employee who resigns in order to join the Israeli army or police.

This list is not comprehensive. There may be other instances that warrant the same end result, including some which have been ruled upon by the Labor Court and some which have not. Obviously, in instances where the employee instigates trouble or purposely causes damages to the employer, he would not be entitled to severance pay.

Disclaimer

This article is a general guideline and by no means should it be used except in clear cut cases. It is advisable to consult with a labor law specialist or a lawyer who deals in labor law issues.

Share
Uncategorized

Leave a Reply